12/8/09

News Roundup for 12/8/09

Man wearing dunce cap
FOX's factchecker


-Headline of the day-
"FOX fudges poll numbers to claim 120 percent of the public believes scientists falsify global warming data."

Talk about your overwhelming majorities. In reporting a Rasmussen poll, FOX News bitchslapped the numbers around until the poll showed that everybody -- plus 20% more -- think it's possible that scientists just might be making up this whole "global warming" thing. In that report, they put up this graphic:

FOX poll graphic


You see the problem here, right? If 59% think it's "somewhat likely" that scientists are a bunch of liars, 35% think it's "very likely," and 26% think it's "not very likely," that all adds up to 120% of respondents at least accepting the possibility.

"Fox News' graphics department added together the 'very likely' and somewhat likely' numbers to reach 59 percent, and called that new group 'somewhat likely,'" explains Media Matters. "Then, for some reason, they threw in the 35 percent 'very likely' as their own group, even though they already added that number to the 'somewhat likely' percentage. Then they mashed together the 'not very likely' and 'not likely at all' groups, and threw the 15 percent who were unsure into the waste bin. Voila -- 120 percent."

You know what's funniest about all this? Math is a science. Scientists may not be fudging data to support their agenda, but FOX News sure is. (Think Progress)


-An awesome opening paragraph-
In a piece titled, "How rogue will Sarah Palin go?" Gabriel Winant opens with the following bit of great:


There are, let's agree, a lot of things that keep our attention on Sarah Palin. One of them is the way she's constantly refusing to participate in the relatively innocuous rituals of being a big-league politician. If someone asks a conservative politician what she reads regularly, for example, the appropriate response isn't to go blank and then spend a year being defensive about it. Just say "the Wall Street Journal" and be done with it. But Palin never has done things the easy way.


It goes on to wonder if Sarah's thinking about a third-party teabagger thingy sometime in the future, but who cares? She's all rogue and mavericky and stuff.

Teabags forever! w00t! (Salon)


-Short roundup-
I'm about five minutes away from getting about 30 or 40 feet of snow and I've got something on tap for a little later. So you get a short, two item roundup today.

Sucks to be you. (My Life)

Abortion, Healthcare Reform, and Self-Destructive Idiocy

Here's a bit of good news, The Hill reports that the author of an anti-abortion amendment to the House healthcare bill doesn't give a Senate version of the same bad law very favorable odds in the Senate.


Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) said Monday he thinks its unlikely the Senate will pass restrictions on funding for abortion similar to those passed by the House.

Stupak, the author of an amendment to the House's health reform bill that curtailed federal subsidies for coverage of abortion, told the Detroit Free Press it's unlikely the Senate will pass a similar amendment.

“I think it will be a tight vote,” Stupak told the paper. “I don’t think we will prevail in the Senate.”



Imagine my disappointment. The Yooper rep's amendment would basically kill the coverage of elective abortion in health insurance plans. Bart Stupak, a member of the C Street cult "The Family," thinks that healthcare reform means reducing coverage for women. I think that's what I dislike most about anti-abortion politicians -- they're arrogant and always fundamentally dishonest.

The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services took a look at the amendment and came to the conclusion that it would, in effect, end the coverage of entirely legal abortions by private insurers:

Industry-wide impact that will shift the standard of coverage for medically indicated abortions for all women: In view of how the health benefit services industry operates and how insurance product design responds to broad regulatory intervention aimed at reshaping product content, we conclude that the treatment exclusions under the Stupak/Pitts Amendment will have an industry-wide effect, eliminating coverage of medically indicated abortions over time for all women, not only those whose coverage is derived through a health insurance exchange. As a result, Stupak/Pitts can be expected to move the industry away from current norms of coverage for medically indicated abortions. In combination with the Hyde Amendment, Stupak/Pitts will impose a coverage exclusion for medically indicated abortions on such a widespread basis that the health benefit services industry can be expected to recalibrate product design downward across the board in order to accommodate the exclusion in selected markets.


The argument for the amendment is that public funds shouldn't be used to pay for elective abortions. Whether this is a valid argument or not (and I'm with "not") is a question for another day. The fact is that it's already illegal. There's that fundamental dishonesty again; Stupak would end private coverage of abortion under the pretense of making an already illegal use of public funds even more illegal. If the concern is that tax dollars would be used for abortions, then the amendment is entirely unnecessary. In terms of real world consequence, it won't do anything but stop the coverage of elective abortion by private insurers. Given that, it's almost impossible to believe that this wasn't the intent.

So the death of a Senate version should be welcome news. And if elected officials were sane and honest, it would be -- although, in that case, the amendment would never have been introduced in the first place. But the truth is that the Republican party doesn't have a monopoly on lying crazies and some Democrats are threatening to derail healthcare reform entirely over this BS issue. According to that same Hill article, Sen. Ben
Nelson "has said he'd oppose ending a filibuster for any bill without the abortion restrictions, while Stupak has said he has the votes in the House to defeat a healthcare bill if his abortion provision is removed during conference with the Senate."

We've covered the dishonesty -- here's the crazy. Losing healthcare reform before going into the 2010 elections could be disastrous for Democrats. "If we don't pass this healthcare bill, not only is it a disaster for future healthcare efforts, it is a disaster for future efforts on the climate, on financial re-regulation, on jobs," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse told MSNBC Monday. "You will have a divided and fractured Democratic Party. We have got to get this done."

Stupak, Nelson, and the rest of their idiot crew are threatening to handicap their own party's future over an underhanded, backdoor ban on private abortion coverage. I don't care how you feel about abortion, this would be stupid beyond words.

-Wisco


Get updates via Twitter

12/7/09

News Roundup for 12/7/09

Palin and family
Sarah Palin and all the reasons no one likes her


-Headline of the day-
"'Post-Abortion Pain' Causes Nation to Dislike Sarah Palin."

The anti-abortion site LifeNews.com has an explanation as to why everyone doesn't love Sarah Palin as much as the wingnuts do. It's a nuanced argument, filled with insight and Christian wisdom; abortion makes you mental.

See, Sarah Palin didn't have an abortion, she had kids. And it didn't screw up her career. "Yes, this hockey Mom went from school board, to mayor, to governor to a vice presidential candidate!" we're told. "And her own unplanned pregnancy ended not in the hands of an abortionist, but in the loving embrace of the Palin family."

When liberal women look at Sarah Palin, they freak out -- because they've all had abortions and don't have any kids, I guess. "The next time you hear Sarah being attacked so viciously," the report reads, "consider that it might be because we are a nation that has been wounded by abortion."

Or it might just be that she's genuinely an idiot. You might consider that possibility, too. (Right Wing Watch)


-News you can't possibly use-
There's a big global warming summit, the continued healthcare debate, and big recession. So naturally the big news is that Tiger Woods likes to have sex with people -- people who are ladies -- and his wife's not really happy with that. Now the trees are getting in on the story.

More Trees Come Forward -- Claim Woods Hit on Them Too
Click for full comic


This takes the term "tree-hugging" to a whole new level. (Bad Reporter)


-Bonus HotD-
"Person Responsible For The POLITICO Will Decide The Best Writing And Reporting, Now."

Politico's executive editor Jim VandeHei has been elected to serve on the Pulitzer Board. Now would be a good time to remember that Politico's idea of good reporting is telling everyone how much the healthcare reform bill weighs, but not what's in it.

So there's that. (Wonkette)

Birther Issue Won't Go Away

Obama birth certificateAmong the stereotypically crazy wingnuts beliefs is birtherism -- the idea that Barack Obama is really an illegal alien, making him constitutionally unqualified to be president. It's been so widely debunked that there's really no point in doing it again here. Suffice it to say that, if you still buy into this thing, you're either 1) astoundingly ignorant, 2) a gullible ass, or 3) an astoundingly ignorant gullible ass. At this point, it takes a real effort to buy this urban legend. Apparently, there are still plenty willing to make the effort.

In July, a Research2000 poll found that 11% of respondents answered the question, "Do you believe that Barack Obama was born in the United States of America or not?" with "no." As always in these polls lately, it was Republicans who were throwing the curve toward "crazy." 4% of Democrats thought the president was an alien, with 3% saying they weren't sure. 8% of Independents said that Obama wasn't really American and 9% weren't sure.

For Republican voters, it was 28% non-citizen and 30% unsure. 58% of Republican respondents were either birthers or wondered whether birther charges had merit.

In the mainstream media, the birther movement has lost a lot of steam. After a series of frivolous lawsuits turned into a series of humiliating losses, it quickly became clear that this whole birther thing wasn't going to go anywhere. Where there's smoke, there may be fire. But the media realized that there wasn't even smoke. In the average American's mind, the whole thing had blown over.

But, as the poll above shows, Republican voters are most definitely not average Americans. With more than a quarter of GOP voters being genuine birthers and nearly a third still needing to be convinced one way or another, a solid majority -- 58% -- of Republicans are either birthers or birther-friendly. The average Republican voter is an unaverage American, far outside the mainstream. Given the amount of information out there, even being agnostic about the question is an irrational position. If you wonder whether President Obama's an illegal alien, then you're just as much of a crank as someone who's convinced of it. It's like wondering about the existence of Santa Claus; not knowing means you're a nut. If you're not convinced by now, nothing will ever convince you.

Which segues nicely into the nutty '08 vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin. Whether Sarah's an actual birther, a birther agnostic, or an opportunist trying to take advantage of the widespread conspiracy theorism of the GOP base, she tried to use the issue to her advantage recently by questioning the legitimacy of the president's citizenship and, with it, his win last November.


[Huffington Post:]

Sarah Palin declared on Thursday that the legitimacy of President Obama's birth certificate is "rightfully" an issue with the American public, and that it is "fair game" for politicians to question Obama's citizenship.

The comments came during an interview with conservative radio host Rusty Humphries, who asked Palin whether she planned to "make the birth certificate an issue" if she runs for president in 2012.

"I think the public rightfully is still making it an issue," Palin said. "I don't have a problem with that. I don't know if I would have to bother to make it an issue, because I think that members of the electorate still want answers."



But she did fault the McCain campaign for not making an issue of it.

"I think it's a fair question just like I think past associations and past voting records. All of that is fair game," she said, telling Humphries "the McCain-Palin campaign didn't do a good enough job in that area. We didn't call out Obama and some of his associates on their records and what their beliefs were, and perhaps what their future plans were, and I don't think that was fair to voters to not have done our job as candidates and a campaign to bring to light a lot of things that now we're seeing manifest in the administration."

And here's where things get fun. These comments got some play and Palin almost immediately backpedaled, turning -- as she always does -- to her fanbase on Facebook. She wasn't a birther, she'd never been a birther, and everyone who said she was was being terribly unfair.

But consider the logic here; if her Facebook posting is true, then Palin was faulting the McCain campaign for not making an issue of a "scandal" she knew didn't actually exist -- i.e., she was willing to lie to get elected. Conversely, if the interview with Humphries was true, then her later Facebook retraction-in-disguise is untrue. Palin has painted herself into a corner where simple logic dictates that she must be lying. Of course, this doesn't hurt her any with her base, since cognitive dissonance is an art form on the right. They are impervious to logic.

But what we're learning here is that the birther issue isn't going to go away. At least one Republican has begun fundraising for '10 using the issue. With a majority of Republican voters at least open to the question, it's nearly impossible for candidates to ignore.

But it's not going to fly with Independents, which presents a problem. Palin tried to have her cake and eat it too and wound up just making a fool of herself. Then again, she's not exactly a master strategist and someone else might just be able to thread that needle better.

In the end, this represents just one more problem facing Republicans in 2010 -- how to address the concerns of the wingnut majority in the GOP without scaring off everyone else. Part of the problem that the McCain/Palin campaign faced was the lynch mob aura that had settled over their later rallies and appearances; i.e., the crazies backing the campaign began to take over the campaign's messaging. McCain tried to rein it in, but it was too late. Once that particular wildfire starts, it's only going to spread. And people other than your base find it off-putting at best and terrifying at worst.

So good luck with that guys. If you're not careful, your campaign appearances are all going to turn into teabagger rallies.

I don't think that's going to work out for you.

-Wisco


Get updates via Twitter

12/4/09

News Roundup for 12/4/09

Child playing hide and seek
Sen. Coburn, shown hiding from Sen. Brown


-Headline of the day-
"Coburn and Vitter preventing Democrats from co-sponsoring public option amendment."

Sens. Tom Coburn and David Vitter had themselves a great idea; if Democrats loved this public option thingy so much, then make them use it! Hahahaha! So they submitted an amendment to the Senate healthcare bill that would force Senators to use this dystopian socialist nightmare for their healthcare plans. Then, when all the Democrats voted against it, they could go on FOX News and laugh at Democrats for being hypocrites -- a briliiant plan...

There was only one hitch; a Democrat thought it was a great idea for Senators to take a public option, since it wouldn't be all that different from what they get now. So Sherrod Brown wanted to become a co-sponsor to the amendment.

Well, this was just not the plan. Coburn and Vitter decided they wouldn't let Brown join their little club and sign onto the amendment. I'm not sure how that works, but I think it involves hiding it someplace. See, they weren't serious about the thing, it was just kind of a joke, and suddenly it was getting out of hand. I mean, they're just screwing around and here comes Sherrod Brown, being a dildo about it and making it an actual, honest-to-god possibility.

Man, Republican senators just can't have any fun anymore. (Think Progress)


-She's quitting even faster now-
Yesterday, Sarah Palin became a birther. That's right, Barack Obama's a secret Muslim illegal alien terr'ist and no two ways about it.

In an interview with some radio guy named Rusty Humphries, Sarah called the birther movement "a fair question" and criticized the McCain campaign for not capitalizing on the issue during the '08 election.

I doubt she was even off the phone with this Humpty Dumphries guy before the story hit the blogs. See, the commies thought it was further proof that Sarah Palin was about as sharp as foam rubber.

So Sarah showed them, you betcha. She went on the Facebook and wrote a note titled "Stupid Conspiracies." Not that birtherism is a stupid conspiracy, but the idea that she's a birther. Yeah, it doesn't make any sense to me either.

So she was a birther and then she wasn't. In the same day.

That's got to be some kind of a record. (Huffington Post, Facebook)


-Bonus HotD-
"Arlington mayor fires at Obama online."

It's a big long thing, but here's the money shot:


Ok, so, this is total crap, we sit the kids down to watch 'The Charlie Brown Christmas Special' and our muslim president is there, what a load.....try to convince me that wasn't done on purpose. Ask the man if he believes that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and he will give you a 10 minute disertation (sic) about it....w...hen the answer should simply be 'yes'....


That's Russell Wiseman, the mayor of Arlington, TN -- a suburb of Memphis -- on Facebook.

Arlington, TN, WTF is wrong with you guys? This man's obviously an idiot -- for a lot of reasons. Not the least of which is that he had no idea that Barack Obama was going to be making a major foreign policy speech. Geez, does he live in a cave?

Other stupid shit he posted:


...you obama people need to move to a muslim country...oh wait, that's America....pitiful.

you know, our forefathers had it written in the original Constitution that ONLY property owners could vote, if that has stayed in there, things would be different........



Apparently he writes like the French novelist Louis-Ferdinand Céline... only bad. You get bonus points for getting that joke without clicking the link.

For his part, Russ doesn't see what the big deal is. "It's ridiculous for someone to send my Facebook post," he told a reporter. "You guys are trying to make a mountain out of a molehill."

No, I think they're trying to make moron out of a moron, Russell. You're not making it very hard. (Commercial Appeal, via Wonkette)